Why Being Extraordinary is Rare

Breaking Down the Quote:

“If everyone were extraordinary, then no one would be extraordinary.” — Philip Santus

1. “If everyone were extraordinary…”

This part highlights a hypothetical scenario where everyone possesses exceptional qualities, talents, or abilities. Being extraordinary implies standing out from the average, but in this scenario, if everyone were equally outstanding, it would become the norm.

Explanation:
It questions the meaning of “extraordinary” when it becomes a universal trait. If all individuals excel in everything, the unique value of excelling disappears because there’s no standard for comparison.

2. “…then no one would be extraordinary.”

Here, the quote concludes that if extraordinariness were universal, it would lose its significance. To be extraordinary requires contrast — a background of the ordinary. Without this contrast, “extraordinary” would cease to exist as a concept.

Explanation:
It emphasizes the relativity of greatness. The existence of exceptional people depends on the fact that not everyone is exceptional. For example, a diamond is valuable because it’s rare, not because everyone has one.

Vivid Meaning of the Quote:

This quote encourages us to value diversity in abilities and contributions. Not everyone is meant to excel in the same way, which makes certain achievements special. It’s a reminder that being “ordinary” is not a failure but a necessary part of life that gives extraordinariness its meaning.

It also challenges our perception of success. Rather than striving for everyone to be extraordinary, we should focus on individual strengths and appreciate uniqueness, as this is what gives life its depth and richness.